Perhaps you鈥檝e heard of vocal fry, a quality of speech often associated with the likes of Kim Kardashian or Katy Perry. American media stories detailing vocal fry sometimes warn us that it鈥檚 damaging to our vocal cords, and that women who use vocal fry are jeopardizing their job prospects.
As wonderful as it is that the mass media is paying attention to phonetics, much of what is said about vocal fry is not, strictly speaking, true. This particular quality of speech has been around since humans could produce language. It’s not damaging to your vocal cords, and it’s used by everyone鈥攎en and women alike.
What is vocal fry?
Vocal fry, known among linguists as creaky voice, is a specific type of phonation caused by slackening the vocal cords. In regular speech, the vocal cords vibrate to release a steady stream of air, but in creaky voice the lax cords vibrate irregularly, flapping open and closed so that air comes out in audible spurts.
Is vocal fry bad?
Contrary to what some speech pathologists claim, vocal fry is for your vocal folds. In fact, there are languages such as Danish, Vietnamese, and Zapotec in which vocal fry is a distinguishing phonetic feature, and removing it would be the equivalent of replacing a vowel or consonant from a word in English. It is a natural voice quality, particularly common at the end of sentences when a speaker鈥檚 airflow tends to weaken. (Read that last sentence aloud and see for yourself how your voice changes at the word weaken.)
Phoneticians have been studying vocal fry for decades, and outside of the increased media attention there is no evidence that vocal fry is becoming more prevalent among today鈥檚 English speakers. More importantly, there is no evidence that women use vocal fry any more than men, or that vocal fry sounds inherently , , or, as Naomi Wolf wrote in an opinion piece in The Guardian, who 鈥渉ad been shouting herself hoarse at a rave all night.鈥�
Vocal fry lowers the voice鈥檚 pitch, which is perhaps why linguistic studies by Ikuko Yuasa of Berkeley and Penny Eckert of Stanford have found that vocal fry is characteristic of , and that listeners under the age of 40 . Other speech communities have similar associations with vocal fry. Linguist David Crystal cited vocal fry as a feature of men鈥檚 speech of the British upper-class, who use it to signal their high status.
Vocal fry studies show female language bashing is at play
The oft-cited study that first announced American women are less hirable if they speak with vocal fry has been widely discredited by linguists. The experimenters, none of them linguists, used recordings of speakers imitating vocal fry rather than using it naturally. If this doesn鈥檛 sound problematic, listen to the for yourself. If you pay attention, you鈥檒l hear that most of the 鈥渞egular speech鈥� recordings include vocal fry, too.
So, why all the fuss? Why condemn a harmless speech pattern that is nothing new and that, in reality, many people view positively? This is a typical bout of . We鈥檝e seen it before with , packed with 鈥渓ike鈥� and uptalk, and we will see it again after the current vocal fry outrage sizzles out.
WATCH: What Is Accent Prestige Theory?
Why? Because . It鈥檚 a well-known fact among linguists that the language of teenage girls is a half to a full generation ahead of that of boys. Experts agree: young women lead the rest of the population in language change and have done so for quite some time.
We unfortunately live in a world where language is linked to stereotypes, where some accents are associated with prestige and others with a lack of education. But the vocal fry 鈥渆pidemic鈥� is something different, for it has nothing to do with the sound and everything to do with the speaker. Vocal fry is rampant across the media, but it is only women who are reproached for it. If you have the urge to chide anyone for vocal fry, you should first take a moment to carefully listen to yourself鈥攃hances are, you鈥檙e frying, creaking, or whatever you want to call it, along with the rest of us.
